As a scientist, you will find few things more soul-crushing than investing months or years taking care of a paper, simply to get it refused by the journal of preference – particularly when you probably feel you are onto one thing important.
Nonetheless it works out that lots of world-famous scientists had rejection before finally having their documents posted – including a papers that are few later went on to win a Nobel Prize.
That is not to express the book system failed these scientists – in reality, the rejection procedure is component of great, healthy peer-review.
Peer-review involves having number of separate scientists read every paper submitted up to a log to ensure that the strategy and conclusions are solid. They will recommend revisions to be produced, and certainly will reject a paper when they think more work has to be performed, or if it isn’t the fit that is right the log.
After rejection, the finish item is normally better at least, ends up in a more approporiate journal than it would have been originally – or it.
Hearing in regards to the recognized items of work that faced setbacks prior to going on to revolutionise the industry is just a reassuring reminder that rejection simply the conclusion of your quest – often it is simply the start.
1. Enrico Fermi’s seminal research topics for psychology paper on poor relationship, 1933
“It included speculations too remote from reality become of great interest into the audience.” – Frank Close, Small Things and absolutely nothing